Second Circuit· 5/7/2018
Williams v. Affinion Grp., LLC
Citations
- 889 F.3d 116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that RICO conspiracy claims fail when the “alleged conspiracy involved an agreement to commit the same substantive RICO violations [the Court has] deemed insufficiently pled”
- rejecting RICO con- 22 spiracy where “[t]he alleged conspiracy involved an agreement to commit the same substantive 23 RICO violations we have deemed insufficiently pled”
- dismissing the plaintiffs’ conspiracy claims because they had not stated a substantive RICO claim
- affirming dismissal of RICO conspiracy claim where substantive RICO violations were insufficiently pled, and plaintiffs did not allege any further acts that, if carried out, would have satisfied RICO’s requirement of a pattern of racketeering
- affirming dismissal of RICO conspiracy claim based on “agreement to commit the same substantive RICO violations . . . deemed insufficiently pled, [where] plaintiffs have not alleged any further acts that, if carried out, would have satisfied RICO’s requirement of a pattern of racketeering”
- “The complaint here lacks the particularized allegation of an underlying ‘scheme to defraud’ animated by a material misrepresentation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crotty, Jacobs, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,390×
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-02· cited 1,039×
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 848×
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Second Circuit· 2013-03-01· cited 650×
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanSecond Circuit· 1983-09-09· cited 535×
- Fink v. Time Warner CableSecond Circuit· 2013-05-06· cited 431×
- United States v. WarshakSixth Circuit· 2010-12-14· cited 376×
- United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriSecond Circuit· 2000-05-12· cited 288×
- Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.Second Circuit· 2007-08-09· cited 231×
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. CuomoSecond Circuit· 2015-10-19· cited 172×
- Cofacredit, S.A. v. Windsor Plumbing Supply Co.Second Circuit· 1999-08-03· cited 159×
- Benjamin Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-03· cited 92×
- United States v. Joseph Van Dyke, IIISixth Circuit· 1979-09-13· cited 90×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Dancer-Fitzgerald-Sample, Inc., and Thompson-Koch CompanySecond Circuit· 1963-05-06· cited 72×
- Anatian v. Coutts Bank (Switzerland) Ltd.Second Circuit· 1999-09-20· cited 62×
- United States v. Larry Sessa, Gregory Scarpa, Jr.Second Circuit· 1997-09-09· cited 33×
- United States Ex Rel. O'Donnell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Second Circuit· 2016-05-23· cited 33×
- Bowring v. Sapporo U.S.A., Inc.E.D. New York· 2017-02-10· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.