United States v. Edmund M. Autuori

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that there may be liability for mail fraud where defendant omits information it has duty to disclose
• explaining that a scheme to defraud “is characterized by a departure from community standards of fair play and candid dealings” (quotation marks omitted)
• asserting that we must “consider the evidence in its totality, not in isolation”
• applying without discussion abuse of discretion standard to Rule 33 case concerning weight of the evidence
• asserting that we must “consider the evidence in its totality, not in isolation”
• listing \the materiality of the misrepresentations” as a separate requirement under the \scheme to defraud” element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).