Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 11/2/2010

William Shade v. Eric K. Shinseki

Citations

  • 24 Vet. App. 110
  • 2010 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1982
  • 2010 WL 4300776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the phrase “raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim” in applicable regulation as “enabling rather than precluding reopening”
  • holding that there is a \low threshold\ for reopening
  • noting that 38 U.S.C.A. § 5108 requires only new and material evidence to reopen
  • the Board denying a request to 8 reopen a claim because a nexus opinion had not been provided
  • medical evidence which indicates that a medical opinion is warranted is sufficient to reopen a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagel, Moorman, Lance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.