· 12/23/2004
James P. G Utierrez v. Anthony J. Principi
Citations
- 19 Vet. App. 1
- 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 834
- 2004 WL 2973583
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision\
- holding that reversal is the appropriate remedy in cases in which the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision
- holding that reversal is the appropriate remedy in cases in which the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board’s decision
- explaining that \reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision\
- explaining that \reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision\
- stating that “reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board’s decision”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greene, Kasold, Hagel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.