Skip to main content
· 12/23/2004

James P. G Utierrez v. Anthony J. Principi

Citations

  • 19 Vet. App. 1
  • 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 834
  • 2004 WL 2973583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision\
  • holding that reversal is the appropriate remedy in cases in which the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision
  • holding that reversal is the appropriate remedy in cases in which the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board’s decision
  • explaining that \reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision\
  • explaining that \reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board's decision\
  • stating that “reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board’s decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene, Kasold, Hagel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.