William L. Smith v. Abs Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the language \[b]enefits will continue for retirees\ supported its decision that the retiree benefits had vested
• considering testimony of retirees – despite it being extrinsic evidence – in order to “resolve the ambiguity” in the contract
• “[B]oth parties have offered plausible interpretations of the agreement drawn from the contractual language itself [which] demonstrates that the provision is ambiguous.”
• “[B]oth parties have offered plausible interpretations of the agreement drawn from the contractual language itself [which] demonstrates that the provision is ambiguous.” (alterations in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).