Hinckley v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• timing “merely indicates that the substance of the more recent changes have prompted [retirees] to seek relief’
• “general durational clauses that refer to the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement” say “nothing about the duration of particular benefits, especially benefits for retirees”
• “merely because plaintiffs chose not to bring suit on earlier changes does not mean that they have tacitly admitted that their benefits are limited and terminable. Instead, it merely indicates that the substance of the more recent changes have prompted them to seek relief’
• “[Mjerely because plaintiffs chose not to bring suit on earlier changes does not mean that they have tacitly admitted that their benefits are limited and terminable. Instead, it merely indicates that the substance of the more recent changes have prompted them to seek relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).