Skip to main content
· 11/15/1988

Robert L. Musto v. American General Corporation

Citations

  • 861 F.2d 897
  • 10 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1441
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15324
  • 1988 WL 120802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the employer had a right to amend the plan where the modification clause stated that \[t]his policy may be amended or changed at any time\
  • holding that a modification clause applies to retirees as well as to employees where the plan indicates that retirees will be considered employees for the purposes of the plan
  • holding that the employer had a right to amend the plan where the modification clause stated that “[t]his policy may be amended or changed at any time”
  • holding that a modification clause applies to retirees as well as to employees where the plan indicates that retirees will be considered employees for the purposes of the plan
  • holding that “the clear terms of a written employee benefit plan may not be modified or superseded by oral undertakings on the part of the employer” and collecting cases
  • holding that a modification clause in an active employee benefit plan applies to retirees as well as to employees where the plan indicates that retirees will be considered employees for the purposes of the plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Ryan, Enslen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.