Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 3/3/2022

William Jenkins v. Karl Nell

Citations

  • 26 F.4th 1243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an African-American supervisor’s racially-biased comments about his White employees was circumstantial evidence to support an inference of racial discrimination
  • finding that the “mosaic of circumstantial evidence revolves around credibility findings of not only [Supervisor] but other employees who were deposed or provided affidavits”
  • explaining that “suspicious timing” may contribute to a finding of a convincing mosaic of circumstantial evidence
  • noting that evidence which is “likely to be probative” of discrimination includes “systematically better treatment of similarly situated employees”
  • explaining that “[t]he elements of a claim of race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 are also the same as a Title VII disparate treatment claim in the employment context” (citation omitted)
  • analyzing plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1981 race discrimination claim first under the McDonnell Douglas frame- work and alternatively under the “convincing mosaic” method

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.