Eleventh Circuit· 6/30/2004

Loretta Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.

Citations

376 F.3d 1079
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 13469
85 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,735
93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1825
2004 WL 1459558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a disparity did not evidence pretext when the plaintiff lacked director and customer service experience as compared to the selected person, although she made “self-serving assertions about her . . . leadership abilities . . . .”
stating that the plaintiffs “failure to identify a comparator does not end the analysis of her termination claim”
stating that the plaintiffs “failure to identify a comparator does not end the analysis of her termination claim”
finding that the plaintiff’s “self-serving assertion that she was not insubordinate does not alone establish that she was terminated because of her sex”
holding employee’s assertion she was not insubordinate did not alone establish she was terminated because of her sex
noting that the elements of a Section 1981 claim are essentially the same as a claim pursuant to Section 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hull, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

241 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.