Skip to main content
· 1/4/2016

William Gibson v. USA

Citations

  • 809 F.3d 807
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 30
  • 2016 WL 53818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “Government’s decisions about routine property maintenance, decisions with which any private landowner would be concerned, are not susceptible to the kind of policy analysis shielded by the discretionary function exception”
  • the inquiry is “not whether the 17 decision maker in fact engaged in a policy analysis”
  • “The Government’s decisions about routine property maintenance, decisions with which any private landowner would be concerned, are not susceptible to the kind of policy analysis shielded by the discretionary function exception.”
  • “summary judgment is a disposition on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Smith, Southwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.