MS Tabea Schiffahrtsgesellschaft MBH & Co. KG v. Board of Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “dismiss[al] . . . for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . . . conclusively determined the parties’ rights and liabilities”
• holding that “dismiss[al] . . . for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . . . conclusively determined the parties’ rights and liabilities”
• explaining that “[t]he Suits in Admiralty Act (SAA) . . . provides the appropriate waiver for maritime tort claims against the United States”
• explaining that “[t]he Suits in Admiralty Act (SAA) . . . provides the appropriate waiver for maritime tort claims against the United States” (citing 46 U.S.C. § 30903)
• concluding the federal discretionary-function exception barred “failure to dredge claims”
• finding Corps’ dredging decisions in maintaining navigability of the Mississippi River fell under the discretionary function exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).