John R. Cope v. Roland G. Scott United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the discretionary function defense did not vitiate an alleged failure to warn about hazardous road conditions
• concluding that the Park Service had “chosen to manage the road in a manner more amenable to commuting through nature than communing with it”
• concluding that the discretionary function defense did not vitiate an alleged failure to warn about hazardous road conditions
• holding that exception did not apply to claim that government failed to post adequate warning signs of dangerous road conditions
• concluding that the Park Service had \chosen to manage the road in a manner more amenable to commuting through nature than communing with it\
• holding that failure to post adequate street warnings was not a decision “fraught with public policy considerations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).