Pryor v. Berryhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a focus on principles of proximate cause was irrelevant in a contract case and confounded the analysis of damages
• stating that compensatory damages are the typical remedy for a breach of contract and explaining that “compensatory damages put the innocent party into the position he or she would have achieved had the contract been completed”
• “Under contract law, a party who breaches a contract is liable for all of the natural and probable consequences of the breach of that contract.” (quoting Pickett v. Lloyd’s, 621 A.2d 445, 454 (N.J. 1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).