Skip to main content
· 3/10/1965

Willets v. Emhart Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 152 Conn. 487
  • 208 A.2d 546
  • 1965 Conn. LEXIS 507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • corporate personnel policy on severance pay deemed to have become part of understood employment agreement
  • sale of division resulted in involuntary termination despite fact plaintiffs accepted position with successor
  • \All of them [the plaintiffs] lost their seniority rights with the defendant\
  • “All of them [the plaintiffs] lost their seniority rights with the defendant”
  • “There can be no question that the sale of its Mixim division by the defendant involved a permanent release of the plaintiffs. By that sale, the defendant made certain that it could no longer fulfill its part of the employment relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Murphy, Alcorn, Comley, Shannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.