Skip to main content
· 3/20/1973

Chapin v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.

Citations

  • 31 Cal. App. 3d 192
  • 107 Cal. Rptr. 111
  • 1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 1061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the sale [of a business as an ongoing concern] involved a permanent release of the Employees\
  • “the sale [of a business as an ongoing concern] involved a permanent release of the Employees”
  • \... the termination benefits provided by Core to the Employees were not equal to those previously available from Fairchild.\
  • “... the termination benefits provided by Core to the Employees were not equal to those previously available from Fairchild.”
  • “The termination was entirely involuntary on the part of the Employees. Fairchild sold Memory Products ... and by its voluntary act made it wholly impossible for the Employees to continue their employment with Fairchild.”
  • \The termination was entirely involuntary on the part of the Employees. Fairchild sold Memory Products . . . and by its volun- tary act made it wholly impossible for the Employees to continue their employment with Fairchild.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.