Supreme Court of Georgia· 9/10/2012
Wilkins v. State
Citations
- 291 Ga. 483
- 731 S.E.2d 346
- 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2780
- 2012 WL 3888186
- 2012 Ga. LEXIS 681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a recorded phone call was properly admitted under the former version of OCGA § 24-6-621 to contradict the witness’s testimony that no one from the State had called her
- holding that it was highly probable that allowing summary of cellular telephone records to go out with jury during deliberations did not contribute to verdict where underlying records were admitted into evidence by stipulation
- criminal history of family members is sufficiently race-neutral reason to exercise peremptory strike
- criminal history of family members is sufficiently race-neutral reason to exercise peremptory strike
- applying OCGA § 17-16- 6
- applying OCGA § 17-16- 6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Devaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-02-02· cited 24×
- MOORE v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-05-17· cited 24×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-11-24· cited 17×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-05-07· cited 17×
- Lofton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-02-15· cited 17×
- State v. Javaris BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-08-10· cited 14×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-09· cited 10×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-10-21· cited 9×
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-24· cited 9×
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-10· cited 7×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-07-05· cited 5×
- Stacey D. Williams, Jr. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-06-09· cited 4×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-03· cited 2×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-05-20· cited 1×
- State v. Javaris BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-06-22
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-01
- YOUNG v. THE STATE 6-24-2021 Substitute Opinion Issued.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-24
- Shala King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-10-09
- Charles Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-03
- Omega Henry Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-10
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1995-10-16· cited 89×
- Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-05-07· cited 62×
- James v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-03-01· cited 53×
- Mickens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-03-01· cited 41×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-08· cited 41×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-11-08· cited 40×
- Tibbs v. TibbsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 29×
- Agee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-10-24· cited 23×
- Norris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-04-26· cited 21×
- Cockrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-01-22· cited 20×
- Ottis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-07· cited 20×
- Compton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-10-02· cited 19×
- McLarty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-04-27· cited 11×
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-09-22· cited 11×
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-04-25· cited 7×
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-09-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.