McKenzie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the continuing witness rule did not apply to a timeline of the defendants’ cell phone activity created by an investigator for the district attorney’s office
• continuing witness rule did not apply to a timeline of the defendants’ cell phone activity created by an investigator for the district attorney’s office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-09-10· cited 24×
• MOORE v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-05-17· cited 24×
• Stacey D. Williams, Jr. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-06-09· cited 4×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-05
• Feriena Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-05
• Reginald Zhon Simmons v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2023-09-26

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kent v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-11· cited 27×
• State v. Mayze
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-11-21· cited 22×
• Flournoy v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-04-29· cited 21×
• Hinton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-01· cited 18×
• Rasch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-03-19· cited 11×
• Moss v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-02-04· cited 8×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-01· cited 8×
• Archer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-16· cited 6×