Skip to main content

Wicker v. State

Citations

  • 696 S.W.2d 680
  • 1985 Tex. App. LEXIS 7368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellant asserted ability to consent based on promiscuity, but court did not mention whether consent was material in analyzing promiscuity
  • appellant asserted ability to consent based on promiscuity, but court did not mention whether consent was material in analyzing promiscuity
  • two sexual acts, one being intercourse, before the date of the offense do not constitute promiscuousness and the trial court did not err in refusing to give a jury instruction on the promiscuousness defense
  • two sexual acts, one being intercourse, before the date of the offense do not constitute promiscuousness and the trial court did not err in refusing to give a jury instruction on the promiscuousness defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carver, Guillot, Deva-Ny

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.