Skip to main content
· 7/1/1874

Dinkens v. State

Citations

  • 42 Tex. 250

Syllabus

<p>1. Due biligence. An application for continuance by a defendant, who •before indictment had been committed by a magistrate in default of bail, if good in other respects, cannot be refused on the ground that the accused had not used diligence to procure his testimony before indictment : no statute authorizes the clerk to issue process for witnesses before indictment found.</p> <p>2. When the application for continuance complies with the requirements of law, no discretion exists in granting it.</p>

Judges: Reeves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.