· 9/20/1976
Turley v. Bolin
Citations
- 554 P.2d 1288
- 27 Ariz. App. 345
- 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the phrase “not less than,” when considered alone, indicates a flexible filing standard that is subject to change to meet the requirements of growth
- providing that a \constitutional filing limitation must be considered in the context of the important legislative rights reserved\ to the people via the initiative process
- providing that a “constitutional filing limitation must be considered in the context of the important legislative rights reserved” to the people via the initiative process
- striking down statute requiring filing five months before election, when constitutional deadline was four months
- court of appeals heard appeal from trial court’s judgment refusing to enjoin Secretary of State from placing initiative measure on ballot
- “[T]he legislative authority, acting in a representative capacity only, was in all respects intended to be subordinate to direct action by the people.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haire, Eubank, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.