Skip to main content
· 9/20/1976

Turley v. Bolin

Citations

  • 554 P.2d 1288
  • 27 Ariz. App. 345
  • 1976 Ariz. App. LEXIS 614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the phrase “not less than,” when considered alone, indicates a flexible filing standard that is subject to change to meet the requirements of growth
  • providing that a \constitutional filing limitation must be considered in the context of the important legislative rights reserved\ to the people via the initiative process
  • providing that a “constitutional filing limitation must be considered in the context of the important legislative rights reserved” to the people via the initiative process
  • striking down statute requiring filing five months before election, when constitutional deadline was four months
  • court of appeals heard appeal from trial court’s judgment refusing to enjoin Secretary of State from placing initiative measure on ballot
  • “[T]he legislative authority, acting in a representative capacity only, was in all respects intended to be subordinate to direct action by the people.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haire, Eubank, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.