S.D. New York· 9/19/2007

Whitley v. Ercole

Citations

509 F. Supp. 2d 410
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68936
2007 WL 2717873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that, as a general matter, “a petitioner’s showing of his confusion, if reasonable, concerning the delay in his state filing would satisfy the Rhines requirement of ‘good cause’”
“hold[ing] that a petitioner’s showing of his confusion, if reasonable, concerning the delay in his state filing would satisfy the Rhines requirement of ‘good cause”
“hold[ing] that a petitioner’s showing of his confusion, if reasonable, concerning the delay in his state filing would satisfy the Rhines requirement of ‘good cause”
granting stay on account of the petitioner’s pending 440.10 motion in state court
“[A] petitioner’s showing of his confusion, if reasonable, concerning the delay in his state filing would satisfy the Rhines requirement of ‘good cause.’”
hold that “a petitioner’s showing of his confusion, if reasonable, concerning the delay in his state filing would satisfy the Rhines requirement of ‘good cause’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hellerstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.