White v. Mercury Marine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when Congress uses the word “accrue,” they mean when the plaintiff has discovered their injury
• explaining that we ordinarily presume that Congress “act[s] with the knowledge of existing law and interpretations when it passes new legislation”
• explaining that we ordinarily presume that Congress “act[s] with the knowledge of existing law and interpretations when it passes new legislation”
• refusing to apply the discovery rule to a maritime worker’s claim against a manufacturer of marine engines for hearing loss he suffered in the course of three decades of occupational exposure
• “Congress is assumed to act with the knowledge of existing law and interpretations when it passes new legislation.”
• \Congress is assumed to act with the knowledge of existing law and interpretations when it passes new legislation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named White v. Mercury Marine

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• White v. Mercury Marine
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-12-01
• White v. Mercury Marine
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-12-01