Skip to main content

White v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 100
  • 1993 WL 263665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred by instructing the jury under the consumer expectation test, “rather than” under the risk-benefit test, where a truck driver alleged that his gasoline-delivery truck exploded due to a defectively designed engine
  • reversing trial court because it failed to instruct the jury on the risk-benefit test
  • “To support an instruction on the affirmative defense of negligence per se, defendants must show that plaintiff violated a regulation regulating his conduct and that the violation caused plaintiff’s injuries.”
  • error in instructing on consumer expectation test was not harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Ney, Criswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named White v. Caterpillar, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.