Skip to main content

Armentrout v. FMC Corp.

Citations

  • 842 P.2d 175
  • 1992 WL 345832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the burden is on the consumer, not the manufacturer, to show that the benefits of a proposed design alternative outweigh the risks, and remanding for a new trial
  • explaining in dictum that relevant factors cannot be confined to a single list which must always be applied regardless of circumstances
  • noting that “defective” had a particular meaning in design-defect cases
  • “Depending on the circumstances of each case, flexibility is necessary to decide which factors are to be applied, and the list of factors mentioned in Ortho and Camacho may be expanded or contracted as needed.”
  • findings of civil plain error under Fed.R.Civ.P. 51(d
  • describing types of defective product claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullarkey, Erickson, Vollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.