People v. Suttmiller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant asserted a cognizable illegal sentence claim when the defendant argued that the amount of restitution was improper because it included a rental value of an item that the victim never rented
• use of rental value as a way to measure vietim's loss did not result in an illegal sentence
• use of rental value as a way to measure victim's loss did not result in an illegal sentence
• restitution proper for rental value of asphalt roller because rental value was reasonable calculation of victim’s losses occasioned by temporary loss of item
• cross-appeal required when party seeks to increase rights under judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).