Skip to main content

Whitaker v. State

Citations

  • 499 S.E.2d 888
  • 269 Ga. 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant did not establish a prima facie case of gender or race discrimination based on the State's use of three strikes to eliminate white females, three to eliminate white males, and three to eliminate African-American females
  • holding that the defendant did not establish a prima facie case of gender or race discrimination based on the State’s use of three strikes to eliminate white females, three to eliminate white males, and three to eliminate African-American females
  • addressing the State’s use of 66 percent of its peremptory strikes to strike women
  • finding identification admissible where witnesses testified that officers did not suggest who they should identify
  • “variances in texture, shading or tone [of the photographs] will not necessarily render the procedure impermissibly suggestive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.