Skip to main content

Jordan v. State

Citations

  • 276 S.E.2d 224
  • 247 Ga. 328
  • 1981 Ga. LEXIS 692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting prejudice to a defendant’s case occurs when facts introduced in testimony and not when the prosecutor refers to the fact
  • former police officers currently working at state correctional facility not subject to challenge for cause
  • former police officers currently working at state correctional facility not subject to challenge for cause
  • “There are two types of challenges to an individual juror for cause: (1) for principal cause, and (2
  • exclusion of defense witness’s testimony was error but error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt
  • in light of a defendant’s constitutional right to call witnesses on his behalf, a defense witness who has violated the rule of sequestration in a criminal case shall not be prevented from testifying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

115 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.