Wheeler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that mug shots of the defendant were not unfairly prejudicial because a detective told the jury that the photographs were taken the day of his arrest for the current charges
• noting that a jury would naturally presume that the defendant was arrested on the underlying charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wentz v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-15· cited 77×
• Boyd v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-03-07· cited 45×
• Adam Wakefield v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-07-03
• Justin M. Lower v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-07-30

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
• Edgecomb v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-11-01· cited 98×
• Cutter v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-17· cited 85×
• Woods v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-11-28· cited 73×
• Spurlock v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-05-02· cited 64×
• Underwood v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-10· cited 63×
• Byers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-03· cited 55×
• Humphrey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 53×
• Powell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-20· cited 30×
• Coleman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-11-29· cited 24×
• Splunge v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-10-25· cited 22×
• Komyatti v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 12×
• Clifford v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-01-03· cited 7×