Skip to main content

Boyd v. State

Citations

  • 766 N.E.2d 396
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 333
  • 2002 WL 358645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the State’s argument that the “double jeopardy analysis [announced in Richardson] rendered] the ‘continuing crime doctrine’ obsolete”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Baker, Mattingly-May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.