Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 845 So. 2d 987
  • 2003 WL 21202971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant failed to preserve claim of fundamental error where he did not raise issue until he filed reply brief
  • ruling that the court “cannot consider” possible fundamental errors because the appellant “failed to raise these issues in the initial brief”
  • “Because appellant failed to raise these issues in the initial brief, we cannot consider them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.