Supreme Court of Delaware· 3/2/2016

Wheeler v. State

Citations

135 A.3d 282
2016 Del. LEXIS 121
2016 WL 825395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting \three cases in which this Court held that our State Constitution provides somewhat broader constitutional protections.\
assigning pseudonyms for the complaining child witnesses because they were juveniles at the time they were subject to abuse
invalidating warrant to search any digital device in part because “nothing in the Affidavits support[ed] an inference that evidence may be found on DVDs or optical cameras”
listing the areas of the phone to be searched ‘to include but not limited to: registry entries, pictures, images, temporary internet files, internet history files, chat logs, writings, passwords, usernames, buddy names, screen names, email, connection logs, or other evidence.”
listing the areas of the phone to be searched “to include but not limited to: registry entries, pictures, images, temporary internet files, internet history files, chat logs, writings, passwords, user names, buddy names, screen names, email, connection logs, or other evidence.”
\Some irrelevant files may have to be at least cursorily perused to determine whether they are within the authorized search ambit.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura, Vaughn, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.