Wheeler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State acted in bad faith in nol prossing the charges when its DNA evidence would not be ready by the time of trial in 19 days because, although the purpose of the nol pros was not to evade the 180-day rule, the necessary effect of the nol pros was to circumvent it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-06-11· cited 26×
• State v. Huntley
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-12· cited 22×
• Jules v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-01· cited 11×
• White v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-28
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-13

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Curley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-03· cited 53×
• State v. Glenn
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-03· cited 22×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-24· cited 19×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-04· cited 14×
• State v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-14· cited 13×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-15· cited 11×
• Alther v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-06-08· cited 9×
• State v. Dorsey
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-03-31· cited 7×
• State v. Price
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-10-10· cited 6×
• State v. Akopian
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-05· cited 6×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-25· cited 6×
• Ferguson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-01-01· cited 3×