Skip to main content
· 9/27/1984

Whack v. SEMINOLE MEMORIAL HOSP.

Citations

  • 456 So. 2d 561
  • 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2089
  • 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Entering the order of recusal did not absolve the court of jurisdiction for those acts taken prior to recusal, nor did recusal result in making those orders previously entered void.”
  • nunc pro tunc order entered after recusal represented only the ministe rial act of recording a previously entered oral pronouncement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stroker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.