Williamson v. Geneva, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that nunc pro tunc orders are for fixing mistakes, not making substantive changes
• court entered order nunc pro tunc to date on which it could not have granted relief requested because it had not been given necessary information to grant this relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mason v. Reiter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-12· cited 32×
• Salas v. Alexander
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-13· cited 31×
• Whack v. SEMINOLE MEMORIAL HOSP.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 15×
• Seabolt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1960-10-05· cited 11×
• Test v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-04-18· cited 2×