D.M. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a nunc pro tunc order entered after the court’s jurisdiction lapsed because such an order “exceeds the scope of the proper purposes for which a nunc pro tunc order can be issued”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Griffith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-23· cited 9×
• Carridine v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-16· cited 6×
• LS v. Department of Juvenile Justice
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-08· cited 5×
• Wilkinson v. Clarke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-29· cited 3×
• DM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-01
• R.H.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-11
• Touchton-Williams v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-05-13

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Perkins v. Perkins
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1917-01-03· cited 59×
• Grizzard v. Fite
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1916-12-15· cited 38×
• People v. Rosenwald
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1915-02-17· cited 35×
• Whack v. SEMINOLE MEMORIAL HOSP.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 15×
• State v. A.N.F.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-28· cited 9×
• In the Interest of C.L.D. v. Beauchamp
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-20· cited 5×
• In the Interest of B.P.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-01· cited 5×
• Erlacher v. Erlacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-02-08· cited 4×