Skip to main content

Westbrook v. State

Citations

  • 839 S.E.2d 620
  • 308 Ga. 92

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant failed to demonstrate prejudice resulting from trial counsel’s failure to object, on hearsay grounds, to incoming text message because evidence was cumulative of other properly admitted evidence
  • holding that “the use of the phrase ‘electronic data’ was specific enough to enable a prudent officer to know to look for photographs and videos stored on [defendant]’s cell phone”
  • holding that “the use of the phrase ‘electronic data’ was specific enough to enable a prudent officer to know to look for photographs and videos stored on [the defendant’s] cell phone”
  • holding ineffective claim based on failure to object to particularity of warrant was meritless because search warrant “enable[d] a prudent officer to know to look for photographs and videos” relating to the murder on the cell phone
  • “We review a trial court’s determination that a lineup was not impermissibly suggestive for an abuse of discretion.”
  • “[T]he use of the phrase ‘electronic data’ was specific enough to enable a prudent officer to know to look for photographs and videos stored on [defendant]’s cell phone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.