Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/24/1984
Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeod
Citations
- 693 P.2d 161
- 39 Wash. App. 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relevant statute provided that court “shah” assess costs and “reasonable” attorneys’ fees against party who appeals and fails to improve arbitration award
- appellate court ordered sanction of $3,000 in attorneys’ fees plus costs against party that had failed in trial de novo to improve on $3,045.42 arbitration award entered against him
- appellate court ordered sanction of $3,000.00 in attorneys’ fees plus costs against party that had failed in trial de novo to improve on the $3045.42 arbitration award entered against him
- the purpose of requiring that the appellant from a mandatory arbitration pay attorney fees if he or she does not improve her position in the trial de novo is to discourage meritless appeals
- a new claim brought in the trial de novo not considered in the comparison
- award of fees on appeal allowed because party requesting fees complied with RAP 18.1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 384×
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 308×
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 149×
- Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 116×
- Detweiler v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1988-03-03· cited 85×
- Haley v. HighlandWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 80×
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-09· cited 75×
- Wiley v. RehakWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-29· cited 67×
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-06-13· cited 58×
- Perkins Coie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-27· cited 54×
- Niccum v. EnquistWashington Supreme Court· 2012-09-20· cited 44×
- Barzellone v. PresleySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2005-11-29· cited 35×
- Pybas v. PaolinoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-21· cited 31×
- Wilkerson v. United Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-05· cited 23×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-03-28· cited 16×
- Puget Sound Bank v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-30· cited 15×
- Fisher v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-30· cited 14×
- Fernandes v. MockridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-01· cited 12×
- Sultani v. LeuthyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-05· cited 11×
- Thomas-Kerr v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-12-16· cited 11×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-01· cited 126×
- Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-03-23· cited 119×
- Mellor v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 88×
- Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1982-06-03· cited 76×
- Alderwood Water District v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1963-06-13· cited 75×
- Bellevue Fire Fighters Local 1604 v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-12· cited 63×
- Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-02· cited 52×
- State v. (1972) Evans Campaign CommitteeWashington Supreme Court· 1976-02-18· cited 52×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1973-05-14· cited 41×
- Smith v. WisslerSupreme Court· 1955-10-17· cited 16×
- Trump v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-04-28· cited 15×
- Wittler-Corbin Machinery Co. v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1907-09-07· cited 13×
- Kimbrough v. Holiday InnE.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-07-31· cited 12×
- Davy v. MossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-01-09· cited 12×
- McKenzie v. Royal DairyWashington Supreme Court· 1904-07-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.