Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 11/8/1982

West Jordan v. Morrison

Citations

  • 656 P.2d 445
  • 1982 Utah LEXIS 1107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying similar prior versions of the Act and UAC rules and holding that an employee was involuntarily discharged and eligible for benefits when his employer terminated him immediately upon receipt of his two week resignation notice
  • reasoning, under Utah’s corollary to West Virginia Code § 21A-6-3(l), that “the language of the statute is unambiguous: the week in which the claimant actually leaves work is the determinative factor regarding subsequent eligibility”
  • \[I]t is not the duty of this Court to assess the wisdom of the statutory scheme.\
  • \[Ilt is not the duty of this Court to assess the wisdom of the statutory scheme.\
  • “an 'administrative interpretation out of harmony and contrary to the express terms of a statute cannot be given weight”’
  • where “ordinary meaning of the terms results in an application that is neither unreasonably confused, inoperable, nor in blatant contradiction to the express purpose of the statute, it is not the duty of this Court to assess the wisdom of the statutory scheme”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Oaks, Howe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.