Utah Supreme Court· 11/8/1982
West Jordan v. Morrison
Citations
- 656 P.2d 445
- 1982 Utah LEXIS 1107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying similar prior versions of the Act and UAC rules and holding that an employee was involuntarily discharged and eligible for benefits when his employer terminated him immediately upon receipt of his two week resignation notice
- reasoning, under Utah’s corollary to West Virginia Code § 21A-6-3(l), that “the language of the statute is unambiguous: the week in which the claimant actually leaves work is the determinative factor regarding subsequent eligibility”
- \[I]t is not the duty of this Court to assess the wisdom of the statutory scheme.\
- \[Ilt is not the duty of this Court to assess the wisdom of the statutory scheme.\
- “an 'administrative interpretation out of harmony and contrary to the express terms of a statute cannot be given weight”’
- where “ordinary meaning of the terms results in an application that is neither unreasonably confused, inoperable, nor in blatant contradiction to the express purpose of the statute, it is not the duty of this Court to assess the wisdom of the statutory scheme”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Oaks, Howe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1991-06-24· cited 170×
- Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court· 1984-08-23· cited 91×
- Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court· 1993-04-22· cited 71×
- State v. HerreraUtah Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 69×
- State ex rel. Z.C.Utah Supreme Court· 2007-07-17· cited 62×
- Doit, Inc. v. Touche, Ross & Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1996-08-02· cited 57×
- Murray City v. HallUtah Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 54×
- Perrine v. Kennecott Mining Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1996-02-20· cited 45×
- Gohler v. WoodUtah Supreme Court· 1996-07-05· cited 43×
- Gleave v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-01-28· cited 36×
- Amax Magnesium Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1990-07-18· cited 34×
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 33×
- Versluis v. Guaranty National CompaniesUtah Supreme Court· 1992-10-30· cited 32×
- Kelson v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court· 1989-12-12· cited 28×
- Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court· 2015-01-30· cited 24×
- Ferro v. Utah Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-03-03· cited 23×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court· 1996-07-19· cited 22×
- Belnorth Petroleum Corp. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-01-12· cited 21×
- Coleman v. MISSISSIPPI EMP. SEC. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 21×
- Horne v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-05-18· cited 20×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Millett v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1980-03-06· cited 66×
- Kennecott Copper Corp. Employees v. Department of Employment Security of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1962-06-19· cited 31×
- Continental Oil Co. v. Board of Review of Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1977-08-05· cited 30×
- Guy Gannett Publishing Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-03-20· cited 27×
- Gord v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court· 1967-11-27· cited 19×
- Amado Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-01-14· cited 14×
- Ennis v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-04· cited 11×
- Knox v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court· 1973-07-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.