Millett v. Clark Clinic Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where notice of intent was filed less than 90 days before running of limitations period and lawsuit was not filed within 120 days of filing notice of intent, suit was properly dismissed
• rejecting similar argument of \tacking the [120-day] extension period onto the end of the 90-day waiting period\
• rejecting similar argument of \tacking the [120-day] extension period onto the end of the 90-day waiting period\
• \This Court’s primary responsibility in construing legislative enactments is to give effect to the legislature’s underlying intent.\ (citations omitted)
• “[Sjtatutory enactments are to be so construed as to render all parts thereof relevant and meaningful, and ... interpretations are to be avoided which render some part of a provision nonsensical or absurd.”
• “[Statutory enactments are to be so construed as to render all parts thereof relevant and meaningful, and that interpretations are to be avoided which render some part of a provision nonsensical or absurd.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).