Skip to main content
· 3/3/1992

Ferro v. Utah Department of Commerce

Citations

  • 828 P.2d 507
  • 181 Utah Adv. Rep. 60
  • 1992 Utah App. LEXIS 30
  • 1992 WL 41603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if statute is unambiguous, \[t]he agency simply applies the statute according to its plain language\
  • if a statute is ambiguous, there may be an implicit grant of discretion
  • if a statute is ambiguous, there may be an implicit grant of discretion
  • agency’s interpretation rejected because it would have nullified the statutory provision
  • agency's interpretation rejected because it would have nullified the statutory provision
  • agency may not impose additional requirements not contained within the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bench, Billings, Russon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.