WESI, LLC v. Compass Environmental, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, where disputed questions of fact remained, the defendants' damages theory was best addressed at summary judgment
• further explaining that Rule 9(b) “requires plaintiffs in a fraud case to specify the who, what, where, when, why and how of the alleged fraud”
• “[C]onclusory allegations that a defendant's conduct was fraudulent and deceptive are not sufficient to satisfy the rule.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).