Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court correctly found that nine months was not an adequately substantial period of time
• holding that nine months was a “wholly insufficient interlude” to be a substantial period of time
• holding that RICO conspiracy claim failed because alleged underlying conduct did not constitute a RICO violation
• holding that where the complaint fails to state a substantive RICO claim, a RICO conspiracy allegation \simply concludes that the defendants 'conspired and confederated' to commit conduct which in itself does not constitute a RICO violation.\
• holding that the same analysis applies to federal and Florida RICO claims
• explaining that “[c]onclusory allegations, unwarranted deductions of facts or legal conclusions masquerading as facts will not prevent dismissal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).