Ledford v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no breach of fiduciary duty where terms of operating agreement “allowed the business activity which occurred”
• “[T]he ‘suppression of a material fact is fraud only if there is a duty to disclose . . . .’” (citation omitted)
• “A mutual mistake is one in which both parties participate by each laboring under the same misconception.” (punctuation omitted)
• “[T]he [s]uppression of a material fact is fraud only if there is a duty to disclose . . .” (second alteration in original) (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “Fraud cannot be the basis of an action if it appears that the party alleging the fraud had equal and ample opportunity to prevent it and yet made it possible through the failure to exercise due diligence. [Cits.]”
• “Fraud cannot be the basis of an action if it appears that the party alleging the fraud had equal and ample opportunity to prevent it and yet made it possible through the failure to exercise due diligence. [Cits.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).