Skip to main content

Werner, Dieter Heinz

Citations

  • 412 S.W.3d 542
  • 2013 WL 5808114
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rule 404(b) permits the admission of extraneous-offense evidence to prove elemental facts of the charged offense
  • noting that this rule “furthers convenience and efficiency by curtailing piecemeal litigation, the antithesis of judicial economy” (cleaned up)
  • observing, in the context of a harm analysis, that “the overlap of evidence was, if not complete, at least very substantial”
  • describing the overlap of evidence as “the most important factor” in this analysis
  • “[C]onsolidation also benefits criminal defendants by requiring concurrent sentencing in most instances.”
  • considering overwhelming evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Werner, Dieter Heinz

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.