Skip to main content
· 2/11/2005

Kenison v. State

Citations

  • 107 P.3d 335
  • 2005 Alas. App. LEXIS 20
  • 2005 WL 327218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidence of deterioration of victim’s relationship with defendant and history of nonconsensual contacts were admissible to evaluate whether victim’s fear was reasonable
  • allowing tire jury to consider evidence of the couple’s deteriorating relationship and a long series of noneonsensual contacts for the purposes of evaluating whether the victim's fear was reasonable
  • State was entitled to introduce evidence of defendant's \entire course of non-consensual contact\ with stalking victim and his repeated harassment and threats offered to prove victim's fear of defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.