Wenzel v. Sand Canyon Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]ection 1681g allows a consumer to 27 so today, however, and conclude that Appellants’ reading is wrong as a matter of law. “[R]equest” in § 1681g(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).