Skip to main content

Bush v. State

Citations

  • 925 N.E.2d 787
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 716
  • 2010 WL 1686321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when the canine sniff was not part of the traffic stop, the court “must determine whether the officers had reasonable suspicion Bush or his passenger were engaged in criminal activity so as to justify prolonging Bush’s detention”
  • noting that it would be-a Fourth Amendment violation to unreasonably prolong a traffic stop in order for a canine sniff to be carried out “absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity in addition to the traffic violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Baker, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.