Skip to main content

Wells v. State

Citations

  • 351 N.E.2d 43
  • 170 Ind. App. 29
  • 1976 Ind. App. LEXIS 969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to convict a defendant of visiting a common nuisance the State is required to prove the existence of a continuous or recurrent violation
  • interpreting IND. CODE 35-24.1-4-8.5 (1971 superseded) 4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Hoffman, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.