Zuniga v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \the term 'common nuisance' as used in the statute requires proof of a continuous or recurrent violation\
• “[W]e can infer beyond a reasonable doubt that based upon the strong smell of burnt marijuana Zuniga Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 42A01-1505-CR-463 | April 4, 2016 Page 6 of 9 knew that the residence was used for the unlawful use of a controlled substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Bullock
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-02-01· cited 135×
• Edmond v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-07-14· cited 47×
• Jerold W. Leatherman v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-05-09· cited 17×
• Paul F. McGiffen v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-04-04
• Shalee C. Dowell v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-10-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Maul v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-06-30· cited 83×
• Cox v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-17· cited 82×
• Alspach v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-09-11· cited 57×
• Wells v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 22×
• Bass v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-09-10· cited 9×
• Terrel v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1976-08-25· cited 9×
• Hale v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-03-27· cited 8×
• Bass v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1988-01-18· cited 7×