Indiana Court of Appeals· 11/22/2005
Murphy v. State
Citations
- 837 N.E.2d 591
- 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2176
- 2005 WL 3111781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a denial of a motion to dismiss a charge for unauthorized receipt of a ballot from an absentee voter
- “Generally, a person to whom a statute may be applied constitutionally may not challenge the statute on the basis that it may conceivably be applied in an unconstitutional manner to others not before the court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1968-10-15· cited 1,576×
- Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,313×
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court· 1964-02-17· cited 1,150×
- Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 844×
- Sales v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-02-07· cited 61×
- State v. BaysingerIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-12-03· cited 59×
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-03-28· cited 53×
- Herron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-06-07· cited 43×
- State v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-15· cited 35×
- Castillo v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-08-31· cited 26×
- Wells v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 22×
- LaRose v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-14· cited 19×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-16· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.